Showing posts with label Communications. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Communications. Show all posts

Monday, December 14, 2009

Computers

I just found this excerpt (over on the ZumoDrive Blog) from a 1985 Interview with Steve Jobs just as the Mac was launching on just what computing entails:

PLAYBOY: Maybe we should pause and get your definition of what a computer is. How do they work?


STEVE JOBS: Computers are actually pretty simple. We’re sitting here on a bench in this cafe [for this part of the Interview]. Let’s assume that you understood only the most rudimentary of directions and you asked how to find the rest room. I would have to describe it to you in very specific and precise instructions. I might say, "Scoot sideways two meters off the bench. Stand erect. Lift left foot. Bend left knee until it is horizontal. Extend left foot and shift weight 300 centimeters forward..." and on and on. If you could interpret all those instructions 100 times faster than any other person in this cafe, you would appear to be a magician: You could run over and grab a milk shake and bring it back and set it on the table and snap your fingers, and I’d think you made the milk shake appear, because it was so fast relative to my perception. That’s exactly what a computer does. It takes these very, very simple-minded instructions—"Go fetch a number, add it to this number, put the result there, perceive if it’s greater than this other number"—but executes them at a rate of, let’s say, 1,000,000 per second. At 1,000,000 per second, the results appear to be magic.
That’s a simple explanation, and the point is that people really don’t have to understand how computers work. Most people have no concept of how an automatic transmission works, yet they know how to drive a car. You don’t have to study physics to understand the laws of motion to drive a car. You don’t have to understand any of this stuff to use Macintosh—but you asked
Personally, I think that is one of the most brilliant descriptions of computing I've ever heard. And it is still technically correct, despite its simplicity. What this quote, I think, actually draws attention to, is just what computers are doing, and what we are doing that could make computers such an amazing thing.

Think about it, a computer is basically just a large calculator on steroids and yet, they've now taken on an enormous part of out lives and are capable of what people could only dream of not that many years ago. How we've come from a basic calculation device that filled a room and would give you results after about a week to near instant global networking of innumerable consumer PC's to create a network of information and people that can answer almost any question is even today a bit of a mystery. It seems to be the story of a series of very visionary people (Jobs among them) and some very dedicated groups each advancing in their own way, succeeding and failing in just the right places to create systems which then evolved and evolved until we have today's globally connected electronic world.

On a smaller scale, though, it's this evolution of systems that can really fascinate. Computers initially ran on actual physical glass valves and now the technology world gets all excited because we release a new line of processors which decrease in architecture size from 90 nanometer process to a 45 nanometer process. That's a change from .00000090 meters to .00000045 meters hoping to become .00000011 by 2015. The scale of computer electronics development is amazing not just for its capabilities, but it's evolutionary path. Fuelled by a realisation of possibility, few other things in the history of man with the possible exception of fire and the wheel have evolved quite so rapidly, so fervently and on such a scale. To obtain developments such as the 90nm to 45nm example, takes such levels of technology in itself that it is truly mind-altering. Engineers have managed to bring about a change of 0.00009955 meters since 1972 and this is a truly astonishing feat. Just the idea of 0.00009955 metres makes no sense to us. Our minds have not yet learnt to think on such scales, nor have we learnt to think on galactic scales, which only makes the computer evolution the more astonishing. We have put such development into this technological pursuit that it has (in some ways) evolved faster than our minds have been able to.

The majority of this lies in the same principle that makes parts of the internet so astonishing, elements of group theory and population dynamics combining to create a situation where such scales of individuals are working toward innumerable numbers of goals in myriads of pursuits, all combining into one crowning piece, combining the work of so many into one system.
And all of that is why us geeks absolutely love what we do. Bceause we all want to be a part of that 0.00009955 metres and we all can be.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Google Fast Flip: the new news-worthy revelation in news...

Google has finally unleashed it's latest Google Labs (experimental features) beta. Called Fast Flip, it aims to revolutionize the way people read news. Judging by what I've seen, it will.

The great hallmark of Google News has always been that it was one place where you could read news from just about every reputable source. This is still the case with Fast Flip, which not only increases it's catalogue offerings, but also allows you to filter by not just topic, but also publication.

But here is where the resemblance to Google News ends. Rather than present readers with plain text news on a page under headings. It gives you actual images of the actual stories from their original locations, complete with headlines, bylines, stories, and unfortunately ads. Then, you can simply Flip through all the stories under whatever category/source you're looking at. And in true Google fashion, there ain't no waiting for thumbnails to load here. It's blindingly quick. During our hands-on, I only managed to get to a story without it's thumbnail already loaded once. And I was being pretty demanding.

Then, choose your article with a simple click and it gives you a bigger preview of the story with some more options, including to see the whole article, or "Like" the story, the usual share options, etc. Then, one simple click and you have the whole story, at its original source. Right there.

It's freaking brilliant. It works like an absolute charm, and I have had no problems with the (still experimental) tool yet, so that's a good sign.

It also has a dedicated iPhone page, which is also fantastic. It operates as above, but a bit better because it has all the functionality of the multi-touch interface. First page you see you can choose your category, then flip through the stories with a simple slide. Then, you can either pinch or rotate your iPhone to get a closer look. Tap to get all the usual options in it's own dialog box as well as some more info on your selected article.

But of course, there is a far more sinister side to all this. The two-step process between preview and story means that it has opened a whole new world of options. Options that aren't so great for us, the consumers.

One of the reasons Google put the effort into creating this, and also into changing into a preview-view operation lies in the Internet's very nature. Online press is notorious. It is almost impossible to make money out of online press. More than that, it takes revenue from more traditional sources. Why buy a magazine or a newspaper if you can just jump on your iPhone and look at all for free, on the fly. So far, neither have publishers been able to find a way to successfully monetize the online press, because either your readers run away from costs to someone else who happens to be free, or you can't generate enough money to cover your costs, or that there just isn't an efficient way of visitors paying for their content without too much hassle.

However, it's been reported that much of the Fast Flip architecture has been designed with future options to monetize the story, if you want to move past the article preview. On top of this is the fact that another part of Google Labs ongoing work is the Google Checkout, a payment method similar to PayPal, which we assume forms part of the underlying structure behind Fast Flip.

The implications of this aren't exactly great. It means that soon, not even Internet news will be free. We could all be paying for our news, even from our (almost) entirely free friends at Google.

What is the world coming to when you have to pay to know what the world is coming to.

Friday, September 18, 2009

What's it all About: iPhone file storage

Welcome to 'what's it all about', the newest section of FerretTech. In these posts, I will attempt to be a bit more detailed than any of myother usual ranting gibberish posts and help you, my dear readers,with something. This week, I've been working on something personally,and it's annoying me, so I thought I'd save you the trouble that I've gone through to his point. That something is this: iPhone filestorage. By the way, a lot of this will be at least a bit applicablefor other applications in your dreary, probably geeky lives.

Most owners will know that Apple has disabled the Enable Disk Useoption in iTunes, or I'm pretty sure they have. So as a workaround,how else can one carry files around on their iPhone. Also note, thebiggest criteria: it's gotta be free...

I'm stingy. Anyone who knows me, knows it. So I don't want to have tofork out my cash for something that my first-gen Nano can do. If I've got a 32GB iPhone, I should be able to use it's space for FREE.

So, there are a couple of options still in the free domain. There aretwo main options: one is to have files on the iPhone accessible by acomputer. The other to have files on the cloud, accessible by the iPhone.

To the first of these, the local files. I have found two very goodapps that make a good solution. The first is Discover. Discover isavailable for the iPhone but also for Android as aFile. It involves afairly simple interface with viewing capabilities for all the major iPhone compatible file types, and a quality feel. Connection is byWebDAV, a relatively new protocol, much better than FTP or manyothers. Simply ensure that you are connected to the same network asyour iPhone, then enter the given IP address into any browser and youget another quality interface with many options and capabilities,right within your browser. This is one of those really good iPhoneapps that everyone should get.(Special Note to fellow BGS attendees: WebDAV doesn't work on schoolcomputers...)

The other good one is FileAid. This app has a slightly differentinterface with separate screens for computer connections, and for fileviewing which can be annoying. But the major difference is that thisone uses FTP for file connections. It has a separate sharing screenfor compute connections, and detailed instructions for connecting toFTP, which is probably a but superfluous consdering that anyone who islooking at this kind of app probably knows their USB from their PCI,and thei IP from their TWAIN… Anyway, this would be great except thatFTP is such an outdated protocol. I tried backing up my venerable USBflash drive and gave up after it gave me so many error messages andthen stopped that I considered punching a hole through my laptop screen. Of course, you can't simply replace a file already on thedrive because you get Error: File exists, or you'll receive an Error:File name too long, or any of a number of other problematic problemsuntil you inevitably become so annoyed you will do what I did and putsuch a curse upon the designer of FTP that he will never restpeacefully again. If it wasn't for this, FileAid would be a great app.You can view documents, sort them by folder, name, type, colour of theflying elephant who wrote it, whatever. But it's FTP, and FTP is crap,so FileAid is a case of 'missed by that much'.

There is, as I've mentioned before, also the Web-based solution. I'llbe quick with this, because I've only managed to make one work, andits quite good. Zumodrive is a cloud-based storage service, with 1GBfor free. You can access it from the Internet and you can access it from the iPhone, but since it's on the Internet, you need an Internetconnection, only here you can probably use 3G data. Not that I would,but you probably can.I've tried to make MyDisk.se work, and it does from the web, but notby using an app like Disks. Using MyDisk, you get 2GB free, as opposedto Zumodrive's 1GB. Still, if anyone can make MyDisk's WebDAV work with anything, that would be useful...

Okay, so now for the bit where I pull it all together and tell youwhat you should use. Unfortunately for you, I'm not going to do that.You make up your own mind. I, personally have all three, just so I'mready for any occasion, but I'm personally favouring Zumodrive at the moment.

So, the biggest things that we can take from this is two things: one,there aren't any really good solutions to this problem. The other: I am way too stingy...

Thursday, September 3, 2009

The Return: Yahoo and Microsoft evokes flashbacks

Sorry to all my readers for the long hiatus, but I've had a lot of work on, and then I took a 3 week trip to France, and then had more work, but I'm back and hoping to return to my previous semi-regularity of posting.

Now this one is a little out of date, because it's been sitting here waiting to be published for a while. Enjoy anyway ...

But now, to the post proper. As is the buzz on every vaguely tech-interested news service, Yahoo and Microsoft have finally clinched some sort of deal together. While nobody has any strong details, it appears that Microsoft is the big brother in this little relationship, with some speculating that it could be the end of Yahoo. I, for one, believe they won't die out, but it won't be a good omen for Yahoo, who are already struggling against the friendly giant Google, and who are about to have half of their business stolen out from under them by Microsoft.

There is another question that is annoying me, and one that crops up so often i may as well rename the blog: Why?. (But FerretWhy just doesn't have the same ring...) Microsoft is not exactly short of a penny or two with the world's most heavily populated OS smothering the Earth, and they've just gone and put God-doesn't-even-know-how-much effort into creating, broadcasting, publicising and (as Microsoft tends to do) smothering everyone and anyone with "Bing!", which seems to be Live Search but with a new face, a less dorky name, and options to verbify it later. Although I doubt anyone's going to walk around saying, 'Why don't you Bing it', if not for the potential of horridly inappropriate mispronunciations, but more because Google is just sooo good, and soooo everywhere. And works so well as a verb...

So why, then, has Microsoft spent a good part of that fortune on buying a company that is being beaten silly by a certain company with one more letter in its name. And quite a lot larger than 1% of the market. Critics have suggested that its just for the advertising money, but this still just doesn't quite fit. For me, it evokes flashbacks of that wonderful tech match-up between AOL and Time Warner. Wow. I'm not sure I've seen a more woeful sop story from a company other than this one. If you're wondering what I'm rambling on about now, it's creatively discussed here)

As far as anyone can tell, nothings been set out about what's going to happen, or even what is happening. Only that Microsoft and Yahoo are getting together and what odd bedfellows they make

As usual, I could be wrong about all of this (which wouldn't be the first time) and it could just be money-hungry Microsoft trying to grab Yahoo's pathetic little share of the online advertising market. After all, they are feelng more than a little pressure from Google lately...

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

The (Apple) Empire Strikes Back...

Apple has had their developer conference, and has delivered what everyone was expecting (which was a fair bit), plus a bit more to compensate for the over-zealous early advertising.

And so, i hear you ask, (No, I'm not standing at your door, listening to you mutter to yourself because you think this particular ferret may have finally 'lost it'. I'm just guessing. Legal Note: You may not in fact actually ask this question at all. The Publisher waives all liability to any losses, physical or otherwise that may have occurred due to misinterpretation of the abovementioned statement.) (to continue from above) what happened?

In a few short words, quite a lot. Just not all of it would be particularly interesting to you. The biggest thing that everyone was looking for was the new June 26 iPhone 3GS. It is not quite an overhaul, but more an answer to what users have been demanding for ages. Things like:

  • Autofocus camera
    • At last, real photos, kind of. It's now also 3 megapixel
  • Video Recording
    • Also useful, and something my old Motorazr V6 has been doing for a long time...
  • It's faster
    • Useful. As always, there is no such thing as a too fast processor. And the iPhone's was getting pretty far from that imaginary boundary, if you get my drift
  • It's battery lasts longer
    • Not just useful, it's about bloody time. The battery wasn't pathetic, but as with everything else about the iPhone, it wasn't as good as some of it's competitors
  • Voice Control
    • Useful. Sort of. I've never run into a situation when i thought "I wish i had set up Voice Control". And i don't think i'm going to yet. Still, the voice control even extends into the iPod functions and everything. Cool.
  • A Compass
    • A Compass? You mean one of those spinny things. Yes, the iPhone has a compass, but it's not just about telling which way north is, (which you can do with any analog watch), but enabling far better Google Maps, and thanks to TomTom, turn-by-turn satnav. Yay!
  • Lower prices
    • Always good, especially when they cut old model prices too!


As always, there is still a considerable list of stuff that isn't there. Anything from user-replaceable batteries (when Hell freezes over) to USB Storage support is still missing. Oh well, it's still good.


Now to less important news, and because i'm lazy i'm going to let my good friends over at Crave do the work for this bit:

  • MacBook range revamped
  • iPhone 3.0 software
  • OS X update
  • Safari 4
  • and some other useless stuff
  • see here: http://tinyurl.com/Crave-WWDC
Anyway, that's it for my WWDC coverage, but have a look around Crave for more info (they are disturbingly interested in the WWDC coverage game)...

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Portable World: Comms: The top-end phones battle it out

The iPhone is huge and i mean absolutely, disturbingly huge. And I don't mean physically. Almost everyone seems to have one, everyone else badly wants one, but i'm not one of them. Apple's OS is pretty good, but overly proprietary. The lack of certain functions irk me, and the Apple-only world the iPhone needs, is just a bit too restrictive. Call me non-conformist, but i'll go for the Android OS everytime.

But, for the time being, there are virtually no Android phones and not many more Android apps (even if some of them are soooooo cool) and so we look the other camp, the Windows Mobile Smartphones. There are plenty of good ones and CNET ran a small comparo a while ago, but it had some notable rivals missing. One of the MIA's was my personal favourite the HTC Touch HD.

Physically, their dimensions are all similar within about a half a centimetre, so not much to distinguish them there. Visually, they are similar, with screens of about 3.5" on a nice gloss black finish, with the odd hard button here and there.

The Touch HD's biggest feature and its namesake, is that screen. Just to set the benchmark, the iPhone has a 3.5" screen running 480x320 pixels. The HD uses a 3.8-inch screen with a whopping 800x480! This actually has a slightly different aspect ratio, the iPhone with a standard 1.5:1, the HD running a tall 1.666:1.

Now to cameras. The HD runs the proper 3G set-up: VGA cam on the front, 5-megapixel on the back. The iPhone? Just the one 2.0 megapixel jobbie.

The touch HD still runs WinMob 6.1, but with HTC's much acclaimed touchFLO system, which is (as i've said before) one of the best ones around, while the iPhone's is quite good, but not to my personal tastes.

Here are some of the more interesting tidbits. The iPhone gets the amazing Apps Store, but the Touch HD? Any app ever written for mobile Windows since the old CE days!
The Touch HD gets real bluetooth, not just basic connection management. The Touch HD has an external memory slot, removing the need for internal flash memory. It has WiFi, and 3.5G internet. It has a 3.5mm jack (about time) and normal USB connections. No proprietary crap here.

And here is one of the big killers for the iPhone. The HTC is sexy, no doubt about it, and anyone who knows their chips can see it's a very similar, if not better machine. But one of the Touch HD's best features. It's not an iPhone...

It doesn't come pre-packed with a superiority complex. People won't earmark you as a non-conformist, a conformist, a geek, an idiot or just about anything else they can think of every time you whip out your HD.
It's not trying to save the world from themselves, and I love it for that if nothing else.


And so i announce the Touch HD becomes recipient of a world first:






PS. It also has a proper virtual keyboard. Hurrah!

Friday, April 17, 2009

The Google Empire.

Sure, we're all going to die. Google has reported its first quarterly drop in sales. OMG! It is also, however, accompanied by a more-than-pocket-change $17.8billion in cash and equivalents...

But I'm not here to talk about their overly boring financial statements, as interesting as some may find that, I'm here to talk about what I've dubbed the "Google Collective Principle". In my mind, it consists of a series of ever more complex statements effectively summarising people's behaviour with Google through my eyes. For your benefit, here is the biggest foundation of my principle in simpler terms: "Anyone who uses a Google service is incredibly likely to continue using other Google services".

Just to be clear, i'm not suggesting that using Google search will make you into an active Google advertiser. What I'm saying is similar to handing someone one end of a piece of string. Eventually, they're going to get mighty curious about what's on the other end and work their way down the string.
What I'm trying to prove here is that once someone starts dabbling in Google, even just for Gmail (but it's not the best example) they are probably going to wind up heading further into Google products. Who knows whether it is a benign curiosity, an overwhelming desire to have an online presence or what, but someone like Google having services for everything and anything gives rise to an explosion in the services used. Google's dominance over Yahoo! and Microsoft helps, but also the differing approach between Yahoo! (everything on one page, whether you like it or not, and loads of ads) and Google (autonomous services, each with a Google touch, and only minimal ads) stands out.

For example, Yours Truly has had a Google account (but not a Gmail one) since about 2005. Since then, i have replaced that with my current Google profile  and it accompanied an explosion in the Google Services I use from a simple Gmail account and iGoogle page, then Google Reader, then the floodgates opened and suddenly I had almost every service they offer. On my account settings page, I now have icons for :
1. AdSense
2. Blogger
3. Calendar
4. Gmail
5. Picasa Web Albums
6.Web History
7. Alerts
8. Bookmarks
9. Docs
10. iGoogle
11. Reader
12. Webmaster Tools
13. Analytics
14. Book Search
15. FeedBurner
16. Notebook
17. Talk
18. Youtube
19. News

Yes, 19 different services. In case you're wondering, Google has only 4 remaining services, being Groups, Directory, Scholar Search and Code. I even use Google Mobile!

This blog is the perfect example of my Google Collective Principle. First, I saw a couple of other people's blogs, and decided I wanted my own. So, already having a Google account, I chose Blogger. My Blog of course needed some tracking, so after my disastrous attempt using StatCounter, I reverted to Google Analytics, which is truly legendary, then I wanted to track my RSS feed, cue FeedBurner, indexing management, cue WebMaster Tools, picture integration, cue Picasa, and if I could be bothered I would have AdWords on my blog by now.

Feel free to comment and tell me I'm horribly, horribly wrong, but I still think that the Google Collective Principle stands...

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Breaking news (and associated attitude): the NBN!

(Okay, so it's still breaking for me!)

Our favourite Prime Minister (God help us all) Kevin Rudd has announced that after all the tenders were in... He just ditched the whole thing.

The Government has abandoned all the registered tenders and decided to build their own, supposedly using private investment. Good luck with that, seeing as you kind of sunk us even deeper into a deep Global Financial Crisis....

After several consortiums spent millions upon countless millions putting together proposals, (fine, Telstra saved the cash and went to the pub instead), and then the Government spent countless millions setting the whole thing up, and checking the consortiums, Krudd decided to just ditch them all and "run with it".

So now the Government is somehow going to muster up enough cash from private investors (could've done with those $900 cheques, hey?) to lay fibre optic cable to "90%" of the population.
Hang on! 90% of the population get Broadband?90% of the population also happen to live in all the major coastal cities who happen to have broadband coming out their ears, yazoo, arse and just about every other bodily orifice. So why exactly are we spending all this money on laying fibre optic cable up to houses who don't need it. Hmmmmm...

Technologically speaking, he is promising all kinds of great Nirvana-like improvements, but without anything to really back it up. This plan has been cooking since the Howard days, but nobody has really sussed out how exactly they're going to do it. Now with the Government doing it, there's a bit of a mystery as to who will control, charge, and/or maintain the system. he's claiming up to 100kb/sec, which in the grand scheme of things, isn't that much.

Oh well, at least now i can add another wannabe to the list of people trying to get us to buy their internet connection. Meh...

Stupid twit...

As any of you who actually visit my blog may've noticed, i've added a new widget! An online petition against Labor's proposed internet filter. I first saw the widget on Hugh's Blog, and decided to drop it on mine also.

As for the filter, i first saw it many, many months (probably verging on years) ago, when there was a bit of a flurry with news articles, online petitions, and even public debates. But then it disappeared for a while, until now. ABC's Q&A, SBS's Insight, and countless other publications of every sort have gotten back on poor Conroy's ass.

But ignoring the media circus, i want to deal with the actual proposal. Created under the ideals of cracking down on pedophilia, euthanasia, and anorexia sites, Labor's Senator Stephen Conroy has failed miserably.

Lets look at a couple of unmissable truths:

1. It's pointless. It will not slow down the spread of internet child porn. Think about what it covers. It covers pages on the Web, period. No coverage of peer-to-peer networks, no coverage of FTP, newsgroups, torrents, nothing else. There is no doubting that there is child porn on the internet, the problem is that it is also in so many other areas. And any system that is complaint-based (that is, it is only blacklisted once someone actually complains to ACMA that it should be) will never get any large proportion of inappropriate sites.

2. It's going to backfire. It is technologically impossible to filter out all the nasty websites, but no good ones. You either end up barricading a glass of water with 6-inch concrete, or you hold back a dam with a paper-mache balloon. My bet is on it doing a bit of both. There have already been reports of people's business websites being blocked by the ACMA list without even knowing! Chances are my site could be blocked because now it has the words 'child porn' in it.

3. It's impractical beyond belief. How on earth are you going to place a server-side filter on the ISP feeds and not slow down the internet, or raise costs, or any number of other problems. And you will never be able to effectively stop any and all internet traffic. My estimate is on around 30 seconds for someone like myself, 5-6 seconds for a trained pro, maybe 10 minutes for someone with out any tech experience, and they will have bypassed the filters. Two main reasons for this. One, other filtered countries like China, Korea, Iran etc have already got a nice semi-black market running in unblocking sites.
Second problem, is the legitimate stuff like, secure data connections used for remote access to business servers etc. Given a little time, this could be easily adapted to the task, and thanks to the heavy encryption, and secure transmission methods, there is no way the Govt could know if it's child porn, financial figures, or a Google Image Search.
4. How? Linked to above is the rather large issue of how to do it.
Technologically, there are two options: Regular URL filtering, or content analysis.
First one never works at actually limiting child porn since there are gazillions (yes, gazillions) of pages on the Net, and URL filtering is also fairly easily bypassed.
Content analysis works by checking every page as it loads. Similarly useless for a couple of reasons, such as the speed. If you have to check every page, it's going to get mighty slow. Also, it doesn't know context. It could block the medical sites because they have a bit too much exposed flesh. Or block news pages, blogs etc. because they have the word child porn in it...

That'll do for now, but if you want to have a real debate, e-mail me or check the chat room below. But be warned, it could get very heated indeed if i get into it...

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Hurrah! HTC second gen arrives

Yay!

HTC's much beloved Touch range of smartphones has been revitalised with the arrival of three new phones.

HTC Touch HD
Hailed as the next messiah when it was announced, it took forever to get here, but still looks pretty good. HD screen on a smartphone, of course it makes sense.

HTC Touch Pro2
HTC's business smartphone has been re-released and against my gut feelings, has in fact become more business-oriented. Now with god-knows-how-many productivity tools and a neat keyboard, it is an attractive proposition indeed for any savvy business person.

HTC Touch Diamond2

Now getting into the business end of said HTC Range, the much-loved Touch Diamond has also been refreshed with a new face, new design and new gizzards. And it's gotten bigger (probably not a bad thing)

Interestingly, however, it was released with an old OS. Yes, the HTC range is still running Windows Mobile 6.1. Maybe they were too late to the market to get WinMob 6.5, but my bet is on the other explanation: HTC's version of 6.1 (with TouchFlo, and other mods) was better than 6.5 anyway! I have always thought that HTC made such an awesome version of 6.1 that even Windows would struggle to improve on. I have always thought that HTC's WinMob was better than Symbian, better than, say, Samsung's negligible improvements and, my god, for someone who grew up with a Windows CE PDA (got the Jornada 450!), it's better than any previous iteration of Windows Mobile. Not that that's real difficult...

Monday, March 23, 2009

Kindle 2? What were they thinking!

My opinion of the intelligence of our collective human race has taken a step down since the release of Amazon's latest baby, the Kindle 2.

For those of you not so up-to-date as Yours Truly, Amazon.com, book retailers of the Interweb released a fair while ago, a device by the name of the Amazon Kindle, a portable book reader made for use with Amazon's extensive collection. Now, they've released its successor, the imaginatively-named Kindle 2. It has grown in size, functionality and tech appeal, as has Amazon's Kindle-friendly catalogue. But there is really only one question that comes to mind with this little gadget: Why?

If people want to read a book while sitting around at home, they will probably read a book, available for a much smaller price than Amazon's eye-watering $360 dollar tag.

If they want to read a book while they are out and about, they will probably want to get themselves a decent PDA, a smartphone, or even an iPhone will do it. And if you know the right places *nudge nudge* *wink wink*, you can get the books for free, and in nice .pdb or .lit files, not stupid proprietary type...

If they want something bigger, that they can annotate on, or do things like shop on the go with a full QWERTY keyboard, they can get a netbook, like one of the mini Dell Netbooks (especially the one with Wireless Broadband built in. Hurrah!). Something they can do all kinds of things on... (Waaaaaaaayyyyy!)

Okay, so maybe some of you want something to do all of these things, and only these things. Then you should consider dropping the $360 for a Kindle 2, which in all other regards, does its job very well, even if it is a bit big.

But this all returns to the age-old question: A bunch of devices to do lots of little specialised things well, or just the one to do all of them, but not quite as well?

Is anyone going to dispute the value of, say, a nice Palm TX, or a mini Toshiba netbook with a wireless Broadband card? (cue Godlike choral singing as the clouds open and light floods down upon these pinnacles of technology.)

Judging by the explosion in the smartphone industry (some freaky numbers floating around!), the consumers have decided on the latter, and this particular technophile agrees.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

First Aussie Android Phone Rejected

The Agora, amde by no-name company Kogan, will be the first Android phone to hit Aussie shores, but the Big Four telecoms are rejecting it pretty much out of hand.

Optus says it will probably work, but its not an Optus handset, so they won't even test it or look into it any further.
Telstra is running a similar line saying it should work, but it hasn't been "optimised" for their network, so there is no guarantee on quality of service...
3 say it might happen, saying Android is "an excellent platform", and saying they might launch an Android phone in the future, but they only say that the Agora should "in principle" work fine.
Vodafone, however, look like being the sole carrier for the Agora. From ZDNET:"Vodafone Australia continues to evaluate the Kogan Agora and will make further information available at a later date," a spokesperson said.
That's more positive but still no guarantees...




Android is definitely looking to rival WinMobile and Apple's proprietary systems with phones popping up everywhere: The HTC Dream, The T-Mobile G1 (with rumours of a G2 in the pipeline), the Agora, plus the Lenovo-badged oPhone, and a Samsung-built, Google-badged phone all in the works...

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Smartphones Nirvana

To continue on my theme of commercial overkill, i've decided to have a rant on the subject of phones. The burgeoning new segment of smartphones such as the iPhone, the htc, and some of the new Samsungs have taken off and climbed to saturation point.

Trawling through the web, you can see almost million of choices on phones such as these. Think about it, the iPhone is today's techno hero, but the other manufacturers aren't far behind.
Fringe brand 'HTC' have already worked from the original entry-level Touch model to the touch Pro, to the Touch Diamond, and now the Touch HD (being hailed as one of the greatest phones around).
Then LG has released about 4 new phones (at least one of which looks uncannily like the bastard lovechild of the LG Shine and the Apple iPhone)
Then Samsung has begun giving teasers about their new range of good phones.

If you ask me for my (semi-) professional opinion, i tend to lean toward the HTC models. They look attractive, they've got decent stats in performance, and the interface is surprisingly weildy.

One of the things that will really change people's minds when they go to spend their hard-earned will be the interface...
the HTC TouchFLO interface is my personal favourite, Samsung's also seem pretty intuitive, but I found the LG system to be the phone equivalent of IE4 -- Slow, Clunky, Ugly and outdated.

This may all seem pretty confusing and worrying but don't be fooled. This is great news for buyers. All the while there is plenty of choice, there is also plenty of devlopment and plenty of competition which all adds up to... Smartphone Nirvana